Welcome to your muscle love-as-querade. A 6'-2" Daddy and 5'-0" Vixen, fit in their 40's and true babies from the 80s. ๐ฎ Very sexual, silly and bi couple sharing sexy fun, frills and fantasies. Feeding both our Voyeurism and Exhibitionist desires. ๐ฅ ๐ช๐โโ๏ธ๐โโ๏ธWe build our bodies and world ๐around us. We've been working our physiques and lovingโค๏ธ them hard for over 15 years together. Happily married, open and madly in love! We canโt keep our hands off ๐one another and nor should you! We show glimpses and minimal faces but our โout of this worldโ bodies steal the show. ๐ Dynamic, sensual and artsy photos and videos. ๐ Ratings by both of us. ๐คค๐ฅตIncredible physiques and breathtaking passion will BLOW your mind. ๐ค๐ซถexclusive photos and videos (solo and together). ๐ฅณ๐๐จDirect/prompt msging with both of of us cool kids, real yet irresistible ๐ Daddy and Goddess. ๐ ๐นPlayful, passionate, powerful and promiscuous!! ๐ฉฒ ๐Lots of jockstraps/ lingerie, cock/pussy, assX2, perky boobs and massive pecs. ๐๐๐Cum, creampies, Fetish friendly, acrobatic sex and cosplay. ๐ญ ๐๐โฌ๏ธWe both like to be submissive and dominant, tease or exploit, muscle viewing through full sexual exposure and tantra play. What are you waiting for, come watch the show!!๐ข๐พ๐ฟ YOUR VIP Admission Back stage - muscle showcase solo and together: All photoshoots and videos, teasers, implied, seminude and nude selfies, etc. Easy filter for her, him or both! You may not take/distribute any content posted here. Violation will result in legal action.
- Location
- United States
- Platform
- Fansly
- AโZ directory
- Listed under L ยท page 100
- Gender
- couple
- Value
- 565 posts per $1
- Price check
- About 65% of paid pages charge less ยท typical $10
- Run by a team?
- Premium
- Last checked
- ยท Dead link?
Growth ยท tracking since ; charts appear once the numbers move
How hot is littleandBIGV?
No votes yet โ be the firstIs this you? Claim this profile ยท Remove this listing ยท Report ยท Compare with your niche ยท ๐ Promote this creator
Something wrong here? Suggest a correction
